Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||First environmental impact assessment addendum for the proposed reclamation of Himmafushi, Kaafu Atoll, Maldives : change of borrow area|
|Authors: ||Musthafa, Amir|
|Keywords: ||Land reclamation|
Environmental impact assessments
|Issue Date: ||Jun-2016|
|Citation: ||Musthafa, A. (2016). First environmental impact assessment addendum for the proposed reclamation of Himmafushi, Kaafu Atoll, Maldives : change of borrow area. Male': Maldives|
|Abstract: ||This report is the Addendum to the EIA undertaken for the Proposed Reclamation of K.
Himmafushi, Maldives. This addendum is based on the change of borrow area after the sand
search campaign has been undertaken.
An Environmental Impact Assessment was necessary for the works outlined in this report as
they fall under the ‘Jadhuvalu R’ of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations
2012 of the Maldives. This report would further conform to the Dredging and Reclamation
regulation. In addition to meeting the regulatory requirements, the report would further
assist the proponent and important stakeholders to make decisions in an environmentally
Potential borrow areas in Kaafu Atoll was originally investigated and subsequently Ari
Atoll area was also studied. The dredging location chosen is about 10 km west of the
proposed borrow area 1, area 2, and area 3 given in the original EIA. The overall
environmental impacts of the project have been assessed using frameworks found on
literature and the results indicate that the proposed project has minimum negative impact
and have an overall net positive outcome. The main environmental positive impacts due to
this change comes from the fact that it is relatively closer to some resort islands and
sensitive areas than the originally proposed areas. However, the dredging location is still
over 500m away from any location of importance. Dredging activities will no doubt
increase sedimentation impacts in the area, although lasting impacts are not envisaged. Bait
fishing in the vicinity of the borrow area will have an impact for the duration of the project.
There are no additional impacts due to reclamation as there is no change in scope with
regards to this component. Furthermore, it is important to note that the approved dredge
locations in the initial EIA were closer to the “Havza Thila” a popular diving spot.
Important new stakeholders for the project include Atoll council, AA. Ukulhas council, AA.
Mathiveri council and AA. Bodufulhadhoo council in addition to resort islands. The main
reservations by the stakeholders is the fact that sand is borrowed from Ari Atoll for a
reclamation in Kaafu atoll. All the stakeholders expressed their disapproval at this.
Moreover, they expressed their concerns on the impact of dredging works on the fisheries
and tourism of the Atoll. AA. Bodufulhadhoo council especially did note that the shallow
reef North of the borrow area was used for bait fishing, and fishermen from Mathiveri and
Bodufulhadhoo use the general area and channel for fishing. The stakeholders were
informed of the previous islands reclaimed under the same project and how the impacts
Addendum to the EIA for the Reclamation of K. Himmafushi
Alternative borrow area options are not viable as the sand search campaign concluded that
there are no other significant sand depots within either North Male’ Atoll or North Ari
Atoll. Alternative areas are those that have already been excluded. The only other viable
alternative is to source sand from even further away, which was not feasible at all.
Importing sand from abroad will be very costly and will have further negative impacts at the
It is recommended to continue to monitor the impacts of the proposed project by regular
monitoring of marine water quality. The monitoring plan proposed in the original EIA is
slightly updated to include more monitoring locations, near borrow area. A two stage
monitoring plan is given, which recommends quarterly monitoring during the 1st year and
less frequent monitoring for the next 5 years. Undertaking the monitoring, along with the
mitigation measures is necessary to ensure the sustainable development of the project with
minimum harm to the environment.
It is thus recommended that since the project has major socio-economic benefits and
environmental benefits as detailed in the initial EIA, it is advisable to allow the project to
proceed as proposed. Moreover, since the change in scope is relatively small, and since the
initial EIA has been approved, and also considering the fact that the sand search campaign
resulted in only one location within reasonable distance from Himmafushi to obtain sand,
there is no viable reason to postpone or cancel the project due to this change. However,
mitigation measures should be in place and continuous monitoring should be undertaken.|
|Appears in Collections:||ތިމާވެށި |
Items in Saruna are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.