Browsing by Author | މުސައްނިފުން "Transparency Maldives"
Now showing 1 - 11 of 11
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Anti-corruption agenda for clean governance 2023(Transparency Maldives , 2023) Transparency MaldivesTransparency Maldives believes that the key element in addressing systemic issues that perpetuate corruption is to address integrity deficits in existing key governance institutions in the country. This approach creates both an environment that enables public participation in a corruption-free system and presents sustainable solutions to the problems caused by corruption. In developing manifestos, we call on political parties to commit to concrete actions that demonstrate real political will to protect and respect fundamental freedoms, reinforce democratic principles, promote transparency, fight corruption and uphold the rule of law. This document details a list of key demands that we believe should be the basis of a manifesto focused on promoting anti-corruption and good governance.Item Assessment of women's development committee in the Maldives(ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް, 2023) ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް; Transparency MaldivesItem Corporate governance transparency index 2023(Transparency Maldives, 2024) Transparency MaldivesItem Democracy at the crossroads : the result of 2013 Maldives democracy survey(Transparency Maldives, 2013-05-13) Transparency Maldives; ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސްTransparency Maldives conducted a nationwide random survey of the Maldivian public in August 2013. The survey used repeatedly tested survey questions and the results are reliable within a margin of error of +⁄− 3.0%. That project was grounded in the conviction that the successful performance of democratic institutions requires a complementary set of supporting democratic values. The results point to significant democratic deficits within Maldivian political culture. Some of the critical findings are as follows: A clear majority of Maldivians think that “politics” is the most important problem facing the country. Fully half of the public is dissatisfied with the way democracy operates in the Maldives. The deepest pockets of dissatisfaction are among the young and the well-educated. Moreover, for many, the notion of democracy carries negative connotations. Democracy entails widespread commitment to the principle of equality. But a substantial proportion of the public, about two–thirds, do not support the idea of gender equality. What is truly striking is that women are less supportive of gender equality than are men. A third troubling finding concerns the low levels of confidence that citizens have in their key representative institutions; institutions that are vital links between the citizens and the state. Out of 15 sets of institutions considered, Maldivians express the least confidence in parliament and political parties. 62% say that they have no confidence at all in parliament. 58% hold that view for political parties. The courts and the office of the President rate a little better.Item Maldives governance updates : the Maldivian court system(Transparency Maldives, 2024) Transparency MaldivesItem National integrity system assessment : Maldives 2014(ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް, 2014) ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް; Transparency MaldivesThe National Integrity System of the Maldives is based on the following key institutions: the core government agencies of Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary; the public sector agencies, the Civil Service and law enforcement agencies; the Elections Commission, Anti-Corruption Commission, and Auditor General’s Office; the media, Civil Society Organisations, political parties and private sector businesses. Whilst there are strengths associated with some of the institutions intellectually, the interconnectedness in their formation and functioning entails a considerable number of institutional shortcomings that weaken the overall National Integrity System of the Maldives. Most importantly, political bias created through intermingled political thinking and practices embedded in key political institutions, including the legislature and the Executive, reduces the capacity of other institutions to function independently. Moreover, political bias embedded in the institutional framework further reduces the level of accountability, transparency and integrity functions of almost all the institutions.Item Presidential election : pre-election assessment 2023(Transparency Maldives, 2023) Transparency Maldives; ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސްItem Proactive disclosure by public authorities : a review of compliance to the obligations under the right to information act(Transparency Maldives, 2023) Transparency Maldives; ޓްރާސްޕެރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސްItem Review of decentralisation framework in the Maldives(Transparency Maldives, 2019) Transparency MaldivesItem ދެކޭގޮތުގެ ކަރުދާސް : މަޢުލޫމާތު ހޯދުމާއި ލިބިގަތުމުގެ ޙައްޤު(ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް, 2012-07-15) ޓްރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް; Transparency MaldivesItem ސައްލާ : ލާމަރުކަޒީ ވިސްނުން ޢަމަލީގޮތުން ފެންނާކަށް ނެތް(Transparency Maldives, 2023) ޓުރާންސްޕޭރެންސީ މޯލްޑިވްސް; Transparency Maldives