Academic Articles -- ޢިލްމީ ލިޔުންތަކުގެ ޖަމާ
Browse
18 results
Search Results
Item Environmental management plan for the establishment of island waste management center in HA. Muraidhoo, HA. Thakandhoo, HA. Molhadhoo, HDH. Finey, HDH. Hirimaradhoo, HDH, Kurinbi and HDH. Vaikaradhoo(2017-08) މޯލްޑިވުސް އެނާޖީރ އެންޑް އެންވައިރުމެންޓަލް ކޮންޕެނީ; Maldives Energy and Environmental Company1. The Ministry of Environment and Energy has proposed a project to establish an Island Waste Management Centre (IWMC) in nineteen (19) islands of Zone One (Haa Alif, Haa Dhaal and Shaviyani) in order to manage waste generated, on an island level. This project is funded by the OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID) under the “Provision of Water Supply, Sanitation and Solid Waste Management Project”. The proponent has requested consultancy services of MEECO for the preparation of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed project. Of the nineteen (19) islands. Maldives Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) screening process resulted in 14 islands being classified as requiring an EMP. This EMP includes 7 of the 14 islands, namely HA.Muraidhoo, HA. Molhadhoo, HA. Thakandhoo, HDH. Hirimaradhoo, HDH. Finey, HDH. Kurinbi and HDH. Vaikaradhoo. 2. Current state of waste management in the project islands are as follows: HA. Muraidhoo There is currently no waste management system in place in HA. Muraidhoo. No area has been demarcated or established to dispose of waste. Therefore, residents have been dumping waste at the periphery of the residential zones. These waste include plastic, organic waste, metals, and glass. Kitchen waste is thrown on the beach areas around the island. Along with the kitchen waste, metal cans and glassware are also dumped on the beaches. Nappies have been buried at the western beach of the island. The Island Council of Muraidhoo has developed a Waste Management Plan (WMP) in 2017 for the subsequent 5 years. The WMP has not been approved by the EPA as of date. HA. Thakandhoo There is currently no waste management system in place in HA. Thakandhoo. In 2014, the Island Council cleared two areas on both the northern and southern end of the island to be used as dumpsites. While there was cooperation within some residents of the island, the two areas established for waste dumping are unused as of today. This was mainly due to the lack of a budget and waste management equipment, in addition to a lack of cooperation from the residents. Therefore, residents have been disposing waste at the periphery of the residential zones. HA. Thakandhoo Island Council has formulated a Waste Management Plan (WMP) in 2017 for the next five years. The WMP has been approved by the EPA. HA. Molhadhoo Waste is currently dumped at one specified plot of land located 250m to the east of the islands residential zones. This plot is located 160m to the west islands wetlands. There is currently no waste management system with the lack of a waste collection service or staff at the dumpsite to handle waste sorting and disposal. Locals transport their waste to the designated area themselves, mostly in wheel barrows. The area demarcated for dumping waste is managed by the Council. Waste is sorted at the dumpsite as locals follow the Council’s guidelines while dumping waste, with metal and construction waste, yard waste and sanitary waste dumped separately. Organic kitchen waste is regularly dumped to the sea with no specific areas allocated for this purpose. Sanitary wastes are buried and covered with sand in a ditch at the existing dumpsite, when the ditch is full the waste inside is burned and covered with sand reducing the volume of waste in the plot so that it can be used again. The island does not have an established Waste Management Plan (WMP) as of yet. During field visit, the Council highlighted that the WMP is in the drafting stage HDH. Finey An area has been cleared in HDh. Finey to dump the waste. The area is currently next to the proposed IWMC site, with part of the footprint overlapping. The dump site is not fenced off. It was observed on the field visit that there was an attempt to separate waste types using sign boards. According to the Island Council, this was attempted during 2016. Although the separation has been attempted, it was noticed that due to lack of any waste management equipment or machinery, the stockpiles quickly became difficult to manage due to the sheer volume. Putrescible wastes such as kitchen wastes are not dumped in this area, and as is the norm in majority of the islands without a waste management system, they are dumped at certain beach areas. Even though a dumpsite has been allocated by the Council, biodegradable wastes such as green wastes are still burnt in some areas of the island. HDh. Finey currently has no Waste Management Plan formulated as of the date of visit. HDH. Hirimaradhoo No area has been demarcated or established to dispose of waste. Waste has been dumped in places such as the area south of the football ground, and a considerable amount of tree trunks have been dumped at the periphery of the south-eastern beach area. Kitchen waste is thrown on the beach areas around the island. Along with the kitchen waste, metal cans and glassware are also dumped on the beaches. The Island Council has formulated a Waste Management Plan (WMP) in 2017 for the next five years, although it has not been approved by the EPA as of date. HDH. Kurinbi The island currently has an Island Waste Management Center (IWMC), which was established during 2013. Although the infrastructure is present, the island currently has no equipment or machinery to manage the waste generated within the island. Waste such as plastics and metals cannot be reduced in volume, therefore the unmanaged waste is stockpiled inside the IWMC. Other types of (biodegradable) waste is burnt regularly near the IWMC. Waste is burnt every week except on Saturdays and Sundays. The residue from the burning is then taken and disposed of near the beach. Nappies are burnt in an enclosed container along with dry wastes. Composting was attempted previously, and the IWMC workers report that 6 bags (25 kg each) of compost was produced in 4 months. HDH Kurinbi Island Council formulated a Waste Management Plan on 23 November 2015. The WMP was not approved by EPA at the time of visit HDH. Vaikaradhoo Vaikaradhoo Council has set guidelines for disposal of waste, and waste disposal is done on a set schedule on allocated days. It was noted that a minority do not follow these guidelines. Waste is dumped at a demarcated dumpsite, but there are no facilities within it, therefore the island faces difficulty in burning and reduction of waste. Kitchen waste is dumped at the coastal area. The current dumpsite was constructed under a UNDP project by Vaikaradhoo Il’haaru Jamiyya. The waste brought to the dumpsite is currently separated and stockpiled inside the dump site. The Island Council has allocated staff to conduct the separation, stockpiling and burning of waste in the dumpsite. Currently, there is no mechanism set up to transport unmanaged waste from the island. HDH. Vaikaradhoo has formulated a Waste Management Plan (WMP) on 29 November 2016 for a period of 5 years. The WMP was not approved by EPA at the time of visit. 3. The project locations and site conditions for the islands are as follows: HA. Muraidhoo The proposed site for the construction of IWMC is located in the southern region of Muraidhoo. The site has been largely cleared of vegetation except for a few shrubs and young beach hibiscus shoots, and is accessible by the main road “Nala Magu” stretching from the harbour area towards the southern end of the island. The site is 26 m south of the recreational area of Muraidhoo, while the nearest coastal vegetation is at distance of 31 m from the site. The nearest residential area of the island is 215 m away from the site. HA. Thakandhoo The project site is located north of the residential area at 6°50'46.96"N, 72°59'42.17"E. An unpaved access path is present which connects to the residential areas from the western side. The project footprint falls on an area which includes 7 mature palm trees in addition to young vegetation including approximately 15 young palm trees and 2 juvenile palms. In addition to these, the site also contains sea lettuce and padanus shrubs. The site is 49 m from the closest coastal vegetation belt, and 73 m from the nearest residential area, which fits into the buffer zone recommended by the EPA. However, it should be noted that the site is approximately 10- 15 m away from the wetlands in the north of the island, and therefore adjustment of the proposed site location is proposed to ensure at least a 15 m buffer. HA. Molhadhoo An area of 1000 sqm has been cleared for the construction of IWMC by the council. The plot is located at the south western side of the island. 500 sqm is the recommended size for the IWMC with regard to island’s population. The site is accessible directly from the island’s main road and it has been cleared of all vegetation. The closest residential area is at a distance of 99 m from the site. The vegetation line of the island is 52 m from the site. There is an empty plot of 4800 sqm next to the site which has been proposed to be leased out and used for industrial purposes. The council highlighted that this plot could also be used to construct an extension for the IWMC of the need arises in the future. HDH. Finey The proposed IWMC is located in the southwestern side of the island. The site is accessible by a main road stretching north to south through the Island. The site allocated has an area of 25 m by 25 m. The site location has been chosen in order to reduce the impact of odour due to monsoonal winds and proximity to residential locations. The project site has a buffer of 300+ m from the residential as well as the recreational areas, while the site is approximately 290 m from the wetlands, and 90 m from the coastal vegetation belt. HDH. Hirimaradhoo The proposed site is located in the southern region of HDH Hirimaradhoo. The site has been cleared and has no vegetation, and is accessible by the road “Mirihi Magu” The site is 138 m south of the recreational area of Hirimaradhoo, while the nearest coastal vegetation line is at distance of 49 m from the site. The nearest residential area of the island is 120+ m away from the site. HDH. Kurinbi HDh. Kurinbi currently has an IWMC constructed in the island. The Island Waste Management Centre (IWMC) infrastructure is located in the eastern side of the island. The site is accessible by a cleared road. The site complies with the EPA recommended buffers for the coastal vegetation (37 m), nearest freshwater well (114 m), nearest recreational / public area (132 m), wetlands (160+ m) and residential areas (165 m). HDH. Vaikaradhoo The project site is located in the south of HDH. Vaikaradhoo. Access roads are present on both sides of the site. The site is located next to the current waste dumpsite used in the island. The site has been cleared by the Island Council. Therefore, no vegetation, mature or young, is present on site. The site is at a distance of 57 m from the closest vegetation line, and the closest residential area is 130 m from the site. 4. The main activities involving the construction of the IWMC include shallow excavation, substructure and superstructure works as well as masonry works. The proposed design of the IWMC requires a shallow foundation due to the structure being a single story structure. After the structural works are done, masonry, plastering, roofing works are completed prior to the addition of the services components such as electricity and plumbing. The construction phase of the project is expected to be completed within 10 weeks. The IWMC is made up of an equipment room, and separate areas to store metal waste, paper and cardboard, plastic waste, glass waste as well as hazardous waste. 5. The operational phase of the project includes waste collection from households, institutions, and public spaces, sorting, volume reduction and stockpiling of recyclables, composting of organics, and storage of hazardous waste. The IWMC has a capacity of 39 m3 for composting, and approximately 7.9 m3 capacity compartments for glass, plastic, metals and hazardous wastes. 6. Key activities anticipated to have a negative impact during construction phase are: Table 2: Impacts envisaged during construction phase and proposed mitigations Activity Main Impacts Major mitigations Workers Influx and Settlement Impacts on flora and fauna Orient workers on sensitive sites, against catching birds and animals, damage to flora, workforce kept at minimum, littering prohibited. Impacts on resource use Encourage choosing of local contractors, Sociocultural impacts Encourage choosing of local contractors, ensure work permits, worker orientation. Transportation of Materials Marine and terrestrial pollution Cleaning of litter, hazardous waste management and spill kits, secure loads. GHG Emissions Obtain materials from closest source, buy materials in bulk, reduce wastage, use of well serviced, efficient, vehicles conforming to regulations. Roads deterioration Include in agreement to repair any damages after project, Use the shortest route for transportation, only the required amount and size vehicles shall be used. Accidents & Injuries Licensed drivers, avoid transportation at night, secure loads being transferred. Site Demarcation and Fencing Impacts on flora and fauna Surveyors understand scope of works, qualified surveyors, accurate equipment used. Environmental Management Plan for Establishment of IWMC 7 Islands Zone 1 Page 10 Accidents & Injuries Protective clothing, works done during daytime, insect repellent to be available Site clearing and earthworks Loss of vegetation Setting out survey, demarcate the plot, fence off, vegetation targeted for removal marked Terrestrial pollution Excavated material used as backfilling and grading. Accidents & Injuries Licensed machine operators, secure loads being transferred. Noise Provide PPE equipment, use well serviced plant and machinery, reduce vehicle idling time. Construction Material storage Equipment fenced off, no new facilities developed, National Fire Code followed for handling fuel, firefighting equipments available. Terrestrial pollution Temporary storage area set onsite, cleaning of litter, hazardous waste and spill kits, transfer all waste to Thilafushi Noise Provide PPE equipment, use well serviced plant and machinery, reduce vehicle idling time. Impacts on flora and fauna Setting out survey, demarcate the plot, fence off site. Accidents & Injuries Occupational safety plan, orientation, PPE provided. Waste Generation Marine and terrestrial pollution Waste management plan followed, follow 3R steps, municipal and sanitary waste managed, waste transported to Thilafushi after works are completed. Resource Use Water Initiate rainwater harvesting and storage, practice water conservation. Electricity consumption Use well maintained and efficient equipment The impacts identified for the construction phase were all identified to be minor due to the scale of the works of the project. Key activities anticipated to have a negative impact during operation phase were: Table 3: Impacts envisaged during operational phase and proposed mitigations Activity Main Impacts Major mitigations Waste collection and transportation Terrestrial pollution Covered vehicles, littering is prohibited and impose penalties on littering. Climate impacts Regularly service vehicles. Restrict use of vehicles only during stated time in WMP Environmental Management Plan for Establishment of IWMC 7 Islands Zone 1 Page 11 Accidents and injuries Occupational safety plan, orientation, well trained personnel to use vehicles. Air quality Well serviced vehicles, vehicle covered, spray water to suppress dust. Waste management activities (sorting, reduction and composting) Health impacts Regular transport of unmanaged waste to a central waste management facility, provision of temporary storage for untransported waste, reduction of bio aerosol release to the atmosphere by best practices, siting of IWMC, provide protective clothing to workers. Groundwater impacts HDPE linings provided through design, leachate collection system, usage of windrow covers, waste not stockpiled on the ground. Amenity impacts Prohibit littering within the premises and en route to the site on the island, impose penalties for littering, regular cleaning and supervision of the IWMC, keep stockpiles of organics low, keep pest and vermin population low. Air quality impacts Cover putrescible wastes, follow composting best practices Fire hazards Formulate fire management plan, provide firefighting equipment and training, Naked flames shall not be allowed at IWMC, placing awareness signs at the premises. Noise and vibration impacts Provide PPE, equipment well maintained and use scheduled Accidents and injuries Formulate occupational safety plan, worker training, provide PPE, use licensed drivers and operators, placing a first aid kit at IWMC. Waste generation Groundwater pollution Hazardous waste managed in closed containers, spill kits provided. Terrestrial pollution Prohibit eating and cooking in IWMC Resource consumption Water Ensure compost windrow is shaded during dry periods, use a spray hose to decrease water consumption, Electricity consumption Ensure the equipment are properly serviced and maintained, use the shredders and compactors under a plan Positive impacts are expected from the operation of the IWMC, which includes positive impacts to the overall health and well-being of the island community, and positive impacts on the groundwater, terrestrial and marine environment. The local economy is also envisaged to have such impacts due to the generation of jobs, business opportunities through transportation of waste, and income from selling of compost, and other recyclable materials such as metals, glass and plastics. 7. It is expected that approximately 20 - 30% of the waste generated within the islands can be managed at the IWMC. Therefore in order to avoid the IWMCs reaching capacity for storage and composting, it is recommended to conduct regular trips to transport unmanaged waste to a central waste management facility. In contingency for cases where transportation is delayed, it is recommended to provide 660 L wheelie bins within the premises to temporarily store the unmanaged organic waste. Within the given size of the IWMCs, 25 nos. of wheelie bins can be kept on site, which can store unmanaged organic waste while alternative transportation options are arranged. 8. It should be noted that without the proper assistance, financially (in terms of budgetary allowances) and technically (in terms of provision of trainings and equipment), the IWMC runs the risk of potentially turning into a dumpsite, exacerbating the possible negative impacts to the receptors. Provision of resources to the Island Councils, in the form of budgetary allocations, proper training and waste management equipment is seen as a central cog in ensuring the proper management of waste in the island. The proponent shall ensure the aforementioned assistance is provided to the IWMC. 9. Implementation of the Islands’ Waste Management Plan, in addition to the Waste Management Regulations and Guidelines for the islands is seen as crucial in achieving proper waste management within the island. The Island Councils shall ensure the proper operation of the IWMC and waste management within the island through enforcing penalties on nonconformances to gazetted waste management regulations and guidelines for the islands. This will ensure the positive impacts envisaged through this EMP. 10. A reporting mechanism has been proposed for each island with this EMP, which includes the IWMC occupier, the Island Council, and the Proponent. Proper reporting of the IWMC operations within the mechanism can ensure the continued monitoring and evaluation of the operations, provision of required assistance, and provide crucial information for future planning and policy decisions for the Proponent. 11. The Proponent of the project, Ministry of Environment and Energy guarantees their commitment to undertake the necessary mitigation measures and monitoring during all stages of the project that has been proposed in the report. 12. In conclusion, the findings of the EMP shows that the proposed activities for this project has minor negative impacts during the construction phase, and minor negative impacts as well as positive impacts during the operational phase. With appropriate measures, the envisaged negative impacts can be mitigated, and the positive impacts enhanced. Given that the Proponent has committed to the mitigation actions it is anticipated that the project can be implemented with minimum negative environmental impacts, and ensure the positive impacts envisaged from this much-needed project.Item Environmental impact assessment for the construction of island waste management centers at HA. Uligamu(2017-08) މޯލްޑިވުސް އެނާޖީރ އެންޑް އެންވައިރުމެންޓަލް ކޮންޕެނީ; Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyThis Report highlights the results of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) carried out for the Development of Island Waste Management Centre (IWMC) and associated access road in Ha. Uligam proposed by the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MEE). Development of IWMC is a component of a nationwide two tier waste management concept formulated by MEE to address the challenging waste management issue of the Maldives. The proposed two tier waste management system involves Island Level Waste Management (ILWM) and Regional Level Waste Management (RLWM). ILWM involves: 1. Sorting waste; 2. reducing volume of waste; 3. temporarily storing waste; and 4. composting 20-30% of organic waste at the IWMC. RLWM Involves, routine transport of waste from the IWMC’s of specified zones and managing the waste at the Regional Centre by 1. Sorting waste; 2. Incinerating waste; 3. landfilling rejects; and 4. composting up to 70-80% of the organic waste incoming from allocated zones. The nationwide waste management plan will be implemented according to the Saafu Raajje Waste Management Policy, which forms the basis of waste management framework and lays out the implementation strategy of the waste management plan. The goals of the nationwide waste management plan and policy are to: •Protect the environment and ensure health and wellbeing; •prevent pollution of natural environment and safeguard natural resources; and •promote best practices of waste management and utilise waste as a value addition. The project has been developed in line with these goals. The major components of the project include: 1. Land clearance (IWMC plot area and access road); 2. construction of IWMC; 3. equipping IWMC with relevant waste management machines; 4. operation of IWMC according to approved waste management plan and waste management framework; and 5. monitoring and adaptation of waste management plan/policy. Components one and four of the project will be undertaken by the respective island council. The councils shall prepare island level waste management plans in line with the waste management policy and waste management regulation implemented by EPA. Components two, three and five will be undertaken by MEE. Since the proposed project in the above mentioned island involve significant land clearance preparation of an EIA was commissioned by the EPA after screening the proposed project. The EIA Regulation 2012/R-27 of the Maldives states that projects carried out in the Maldives which require significant land clearance and removal of coconut palm trees (under Annex 4 bullets 8 of EIA 2012/R-27) will have to undertake an Environmental Impact Assessment prior to its construction and operation. Hence the EIA report is primarily aimed at capturing and presenting information needed to meet the legal requirements of both Environmental Protection and Preservation Act (4/93) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations of the Maldives. Major findings of this report are based on as much information as possible that could be gathered within the study time constraints, including field inspection of both the existing environment assessments and the features and possible effects of the planned activities. The assessment also included reviewing of virtually the same types of works and methods that will be used at project island and review of actual effects arising from their construction and operation in very similar island environments. Stakeholder consultations undertaken with the island councils and public was used when assessing the existing waste management situation of the island and alternatives of the project. The following observations and findings were made for the project island based on field surveys and data analysis: Ha.Uligam – The island did not have a proper waste management system. Existing waste management practices have led to the pollution of island. The proposed IWMC plot is located on the northern side of the island and consists weeds shrubs and small bush type trees. The area did not have coconut palms or significantly large tress. There is an access road to the proposed area, however a minor road shall be cleared to access the IWMC. There are nor large trees which will have to be removed at the proposed site. Nearest public areas to the site are the football field and public school. There were no environmentally sensitive or protected sites close to the proposed area. All residential, public and environmental sites are located at the distance recommended by EPA. Alternative site analysis showed that the alternative location at the southern side of the island was more preferred compared to the proposed area based on evaluation of impacts arising from site location. The study has identified a number of potential adverse effects arising out of the project. The study also notes that the developmental phase and operational phase of the project will have equally significant impacts. There are factors which could cumulate into major negative impacts during the operational phase unless proper mitigation and management is not implemented. The assessment has not identified any negative effects of national or regional importance and will not result in the loss of nationally endangered or globally endangered species as a result of the project. The assessment identified the following activities of the project to have impacts on the environmental receptors. Construction phase: 1. Settlement of workers: evaluated to be a minor impact activity; 2. Site demarcation and fencing: evaluated to be a minor impact activity; 3. Material storage: evaluated to be a minor impact activity; 4. Land clearance: evaluated to be a major impact activity; EIA for the construction of IWMC at Ha.Uligam MEECO | xix 5. IWMC construction: evaluated to be a moderate impact activity; 6. Transportation of trees, waste etc: evaluated to be a moderate impact activity; 7. Waste generation: evaluated to be a moderate impact activity; and 8. Resource consumption (Waster, Electricity and Sewerage): evaluated to be a minor impact activity. Operational phase: 1. Waste collection and transportation: A major activity of IWM. Ha.Uligam has a draft waste management plan prepared which has yet to be approved 2. Waste sorting, separating and compost making: The biggest component of IWM. If carried out as per the waste management concept plan, this activity would result in the most positive impacts. However, based on fair assessment of the existing condition, this activity was observed to have the highest potential for failure which would result in major negative impacts; 3. Waste generation: considered a minor impact activity; 4. Resource consumption (water/electricity): considered a minor impact activity; The direct footprint area in Uligam is localized only on land Within this area, the biodiversity richness was observed low since much of the area has been utilized for the wind turbine project. Flora and fauna enclosed within the direct impact boundary will be effected by construction activities. Nesting areas for birds and other fauna will be effected. Habitat fragmentation and permanent change to the existing island ecosystem will occur as a result. Removal of vegetation will also affect the net carbon balance as vegetation act as a carbon sink. Noise generated from these activities are also envisaged to have a direct impact on the biodiversity. Significant volumes of yard waste will be produced during the site clearance works. The island has no waste management system and therefore additional waste created if left on the island will have multiple direct and indirect impacts on the island. During the, operational phase of the project management of waste at the IWMC is considered to have numerous impacts which include emission of GHG, smell/odor impacts and health impacts. These arise from compost pile, sorting activities and volume reduction activities. There is a high risk of accidents and injuries during the operational phase of the IWMC. Due to the volume of incoming organic waste the risk of running out of storage capacity is imminent during the operational phase of the IWMC if not managed properly. This would lead to significant cumulative negative impacts, as a result of burning waste at the IWMC. Continued burning of waste could potentially convert the IWMC into a dumpsite resulting in loss of investment. It would also impede the progress of the waste management framework of the country. However, if the waste management plan is implemented accordingly the overall impact of IWMC during the operational phase will be positive. It would create job opportunities and new markets which would develop the local economies. As a practical and a reasonable mitigation measure to minimize the impacts arising from removal of vegetation, translocating and replanting trees have been proposed (see Section 8.5 for details). Trees at project site, shall be encouraged to be translocated within the island or to other islands. Due to numerous challenges faced by the island council to undertake land clearance and translocation of trees, the report also proposes to procure parties interested in buying and relocating trees (See Section 8.5.2 A for details). Procurement announcement shall be advertised as widely as possible. Evaluation shall be undertaken as described in the report. Except when all options to relocate treeshave been exhausted only the decision to cutting down of a tree for timber or any other use shall be considered. Hence it is strongly recommended to give the highest priority to transplanting trees as an impact mitigation measure. The volume of waste that is expected from land clearance is closely linked to the number of trees that can be salvaged from those that get uprooted. Without a robust tree translocation plan it is believed that up to 5-10 tons of waste will be generated from the island. This would require costly long distance transportation from project island to Thilafushi. With the proposed mitigation measures combined with burning of dried yard waste, waste requiring transportation could be significantly reduced. During the operational phase best practices in compost management, together with strict health/ safety guidelines, emergency planning and implementation of monitoring/management program have been recommended to mitigate noise/odour impacts, avoid injuries and reduce carbon footprint. In order to address the issue of organic waste accumulation at the site, the assessment proposes to install 660 L waste bins at the IWMC. Based on size and population of the IWMC at the project island, a maximum of 1-2 week of organic waste can be stored at the project island using such bins (See Section 2.3.2 for details). Hence it is recommended to schedule waste collection trips more frequently for islands based on population size. Due to the project being located in an inhabited island, negative social impacts arising as a direct consequence of the Project during construction phase have been found to be minor. The project does not involve removal of privately owned palm trees from coconut groves. Cumulative negative impacts have been envisaged during operational phase due to poor management of the IWMC which can result in smell/odour impacts to nearby public areas. Hence the monitoring plan of the project is designed to address the constructional and operational phase impacts by identifying assessable indicators and assigning relevant stakeholders to prepare and assess the outcome of these indicators. The management plan of the IWMC is designed based on adaptability from feedback provided by different levels of management. This is to ensure that cumulative negative impacts do not exceed to a level that could disrupt the proposed waste management system. On the basis that mitigation measures proposed in this EIA report will be implemented by proponent and the robust environmental monitoring plan suggested in the report will be fully taken into consideration and the recommendations set forth in the report will be duly considered, it is concluded that the benefits of the planned Island Level Waste Management when implemented will substantially outweigh its imposition on the environment.Item Environmental impact assessment for the construction of island waste management centers at HA. Maarandhoo, SH. Kaditheem, SH.Feydhoo and SH. Lhaimagu(2017-07) މޯލްޑިވުސް އެނާޖީރ އެންޑް އެންވައިރުމެންޓަލް ކޮންޕެނީ; Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyThis Report highlights the results of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) carried out for the Development of Island Waste Management Centre (IWMC) and associated access road in Ha.Maarandhoo, Sh.Kanditheem, Sh.Feydhoo and Sh.Lhaimagu proposed by the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MEE). Development of IWMC is a component of a nationwide two tier waste management concept formulated by MEE to address the challenging waste management issue of the Maldives. The proposed two tier waste management system involves Island Level Waste Management (ILWM) and Regional Level Waste Management (RLWM). ILWM involves: 1. Sorting waste; 2. reducing volume of waste; 3. temporarily storing waste; and 4. composting 20-30% of organic waste at the IWMC. RLWM Involves, routine transport of waste from the IWMC’s of specified zones and managing the waste at the Regional Centre by 1. Sorting waste; 2. Incinerating waste; 3. landfilling rejects; and 4. composting up to 70-80% of the organic waste incoming from allocated zones. The nationwide waste management plan will be implemented according to the Saafu Raajje Waste Management Policy, which forms the basis of waste management framework and lays out the implementation strategy of the waste management plan. The goals of the nationwide waste management plan and policy are to: •Protect the environment and ensure health and wellbeing; •prevent pollution of natural environment and safeguard natural resources; and •promote best practices of waste management and utilise waste as a value addition. The project has been developed in line with these goals. The major components of the project include: 1. Land clearance (IWMC plot area and access road); 2. construction of IWMC; 3. equipping IWMC with relevant waste management machines; 4. operation of IWMC according to approved waste management plan and waste management framework; and 5. monitoring and adaptation of waste management plan/policy. Components one and four of the project will be undertaken by the respective island council. The councils shall prepare island level waste management plans in line with the waste management EIA for the construction of IWMC at Ha.Maarandhoo, Sh.Kanditheem, Sh.Feydhoo and Sh.Lhaimagu MEECO | xx policy and waste management regulation implemented by EPA. Components two, three and five will be undertaken by MEE. Since the proposed project in the above mentioned islands involve significant land clearance preparation of an EIA was commissioned by the EPA after screening the proposed project. The EIA Regulation 2012/R-27 of the Maldives states that projects carried out in the Maldives which require significant land clearance and removal of coconut palm trees (under Annex 4 bullets 8 of EIA 2012/R-27) will have to undertake an Environmental Impact Assessment prior to its construction and operation. Hence the EIA report is primarily aimed at capturing and presenting information needed to meet the legal requirements of both Environmental Protection and Preservation Act (4/93) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations of the Maldives. Major findings of this report are based on as much information as possible that could be gathered within the study time constraints, including field inspection of both the existing environment assessments and the features and possible effects of the planned activities. The assessment also included reviewing of virtually the same types of works and methods that will be used at project islands and review of actual effects arising from their construction and operation in very similar island environments. Stakeholder consultations undertaken with the island councils and public was used when assessing the existing waste management situation of the island and alternatives of the project. The following observations and findings were made for the project islands based on field surveys and data analysis: Ha.Maarandhoo – The island did not have a proper waste management system. Existing waste management practices have led to the pollution of island. The proposed IWMC plot is located on the eastern side of the island and consists of a coconut grove. There is no access road to the proposed area hence a significant part of the coconut grove will have to be cleared. Total number of trees cleared to prepare the site was determined to be 127. Nearest public areas to the site are residential houses. There were no environmentally sensitive or protected sites close to the proposed area are located at the distance recommended by EPA. Alternative site analysis showed that the alternative location at the northern side of the island was more preferred compared to the proposed area based on evaluation of impacts arising from site location (See Section 8.2.1 for details). Sh.Kanditheem – The island did not have a proper waste management system. Existing waste management practices have led to the pollution of island. The proposed IWMC plot is located on the northeastern side of the island and consists of mixed vegetation dominated by privately owned palm trees. There is no access road to the proposed area hence a significant area of vegetation will have to be cleared. Total number of trees cleared to prepare the site was determined to be 161 Nearest public areas to the site are residential lands located at the distance recommended by EPA. There were no environmentally sensitive or protected sites that will be directly affected by the project. However, a significant Bruguiera cylindrica forest was located west of the IWMC site (See Section 5.6.5 B)for details). Alternative site analysis showed that the proposed location scored the highest (See Section 8.2.2 for details). Sh.Feydhoo – The island did not have a proper waste management system. Existing waste management practices have led to the pollution of island. The proposed IWMC plot (750m2) is located on the southwestern side of the island and consists of mixed vegetation dominated by privately owned palm There is no access road to the proposed area hence a significant area of vegetation will have to be cleared. Total number of trees cleared to prepare the site was determined to be 137. Nearest public areas to the site are residential lands which are located at the distance recommended by EPA. The proposed area has an altered small patch of wetland that is being disintegrated which will have a direct impact during construction phase (See Section 5.6.5 A for details). Alternative site analysis showed that the proposed location scored the highest (See Section 8.2.1 for details). Sh.Lhaimagu – The island did not have a proper waste management system. Existing waste management practices have led to the pollution of island. The proposed IWMC plot (700m2) is located on the southern side of the island and consists of privately owned palm trees. There is no access road to the proposed area hence a significant area of vegetation will have to be cleared. Total number of trees cleared to prepare the site was determined to be 219. Nearest public areas to the site is the public school which is located at the distance recommended by EPA. The proposed area does not have environmental sensitive or protected area. Alternative site analysis showed that the proposed location scored the highest (See Section 8.2.4 for details). The study has identified a number of potential adverse effects arising out of the project. The study also notes that it is during the developmental phase of the project that will have the most significant impacts as opposed to the operational phase of the project. There are factors which could cumulate into major negative impacts during the operational phase unless proper mitigation and management is not implemented. The assessment has not identified any negative effects of national or regional importance and will not result in the loss of nationally endangered or globally endangered species as a result of the project. The assessment identified the following activities of the project to have impacts on the environmental receptors (See section 8 for details). Construction phase: 1. Settlement of workers: evaluated to be a minor impact activity; 2. Site demarcation and fencing: evaluated to be a minor impact activity; 3. Material storage: evaluated to be a minor impact activity; 4. Land clearance: evaluated to be a major impact activity; 5. IWMC construction: evaluated to be a moderate impact activity; 6. Transportation of trees, waste etc: evaluated to be a moderate impact activity; 7. Waste generation: evaluated to be a moderate impact activity; and 8. Resource consumption (Waster, Electricity and Sewerage): evaluated to be a minor impact activity. Operational phase: 1. Waste collection and transportation: A major activity of IWM. Apart from Ha.Maarandhoo the other islands do not have a local waste management plan; 2. Waste sorting, separating and compost making: The biggest component of IWM. If carried out as per the waste management concept plan, this activity would result in the most positive impacts. However, based on fair assessment of the existing condition, this activity was observed to have the highest potential for failure which would result in major negative impacts; 3. Waste generation: considered a minor impact activity; 4. Resource consumption (water/electricity): considered a minor impact activity; The direct footprint area in all the islands is localized only on land and much of the roads are concentrated in the area where introduced coconut grove is found. Within this area, the biodiversity richness was observed low since much of the area has been utilized for monoculture of coconut palms. Flora and fauna enclosed within the direct impact boundary will be effected by construction activities. Nesting areas for birds and other fauna will be effected. Habitat fragmentation and permanent change to the existing island ecosystem will occur as a result. Removal of vegetation will also affect the net carbon balance as vegetation act as a carbon sink. Noise generated from these activities are also envisaged to have a direct impact on the biodiversity. Significant volumes of yard waste will be produced during the site clearance works. The island has no waste management system and therefore additional waste created if left on the island will have multiple direct and indirect impacts on the island. During the, operational phase of the project management of waste at the IWMC is considered to have numerous impacts which include emission of GHG, smell/odor impacts and health impacts. These arise from compost pile, sorting activities and volume reduction activities. There is a high risk of accidents and injuries during the operational phase of the IWMC. Due to the volume of incoming organic waste the risk of running out of storage capacity is imminent during the operational phase of the IWMC if not managed properly. This would lead to significant cumulative negative impacts, as a result of burning waste at the IWMC. Continued burning of waste could potentially convert the IWMC into a dumpsite resulting in loss of investment. It would also impede the progress of the waste management framework of the country. However, if the waste management plan is implemented accordingly the overall impact of IWMC during the operational phase will be positive. It would create job opportunities and new markets which would develop the local economies. As a practical and a reasonable mitigation measure to minimize the impacts arising from removal of large number of trees, translocating and replanting trees have been proposed (see Section 8.5 for details). Trees specially coconut palm trees which make up 85-90% of vegetation at project sites, shall be encouraged to be translocated to another island. Due to numerous challenges faced by the island councils to undertake land clearance and translocation of trees, the report proposes to procure parties interested in buying and relocating surveyed trees (See Section 8.5.2 A for details). Procurement announcement shall be advertised as widely as possible. Evaluation shall be undertaken as described in the report. Except when all options to relocate trees have been exhausted only the decision to cutting down of a tree for timber or any other use shall be considered. Hence it is strongly recommended to give the highest priority to transplanting trees as an impact mitigation measure. The volume of waste that is expected from land clearance is closely linked to the number of trees that can be salvaged from those that get uprooted. Without a robust tree translocation plan it is believed over 163 tons of yard waste will be generated from all the islands. This would require costly long distance transportation from project islands to Thilafushi. With the proposed mitigation measures combined with burning of dried yard waste requiring transportation could be significantly reduced. During the operational phase best practices in compost management, together with strict health safety guidelines, emergency planning and implementation of monitoring/management program have been recommended to mitigate noise/odour impacts, avoid injuries and reduce carbon footprint. In order to address the issue of organic waste accumulation at the site, the assessment proposes to install 660 L waste bins at the IWMC. Based on size of the IWMC at the project islands, a maximum of 1-2 week of organic waste can be stored at the project islands using such bins (See Section 2.3.2 for details). Hence it is recommended to schedule waste collection trips more frequently for islands that have a larger population. Due to the project being located in inhabited islands, negative social impacts arising as a direct consequence of the Project have been found to be moderate. Major activities of the project having a direct impact on local stakeholders include land clearance which involve removal of privately owned trees. Cumulative negative impacts have been envisaged during operational phase due to poor management of the IWMC which can result in smell/odour impacts to nearby public areas. Hence the monitoring plan of the project is designed to address the constructional and operational phase impacts by identifying assessable indicators and assigning relevant stakeholders to prepare and assess the outcome of these indicators. The management plan of the IWMC is designed based on adaptability from feedback provided by different levels of management. This is to ensure that cumulative negative impacts do not exceed to a level that could disrupt the proposed waste management system (See Section 10 for details of monitoring and management plan). On the basis that mitigation measured proposed in this EIA report will be implemented by proponent and the robust environmental monitoring plan suggested in the report will be fully taken into consideration and the recommendations set forth in the report will be duly considered, it is concluded that the benefits of the planned Island Level Waste Management when implemented will substantially outweigh its imposition on the environment.Item Environmental impact assessment for the reconstruction of Guraidhoo harbour, Thaa Atoll, Maldives(2016-04) Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyThe Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure requested the services of Maldives Energy and Environmental Company (MEECO) to provide an Environmental Impact Study (EIA) for the re-construction of harbour at Guraidhoo Island, Thaa Atoll. The assessment addresses specific key issues stated in the Terms of Reference (TOR) as agreed between EPA and the Proponent following the Scoping Meeting held on the matter. This EIA report was prepared for the fulfilment of the requirements of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2012 with the purpose of conducting an assessment of possible impacts on biophysical and human environment arising from proposed development project. The project is proposed by Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure, Maldives. The proposed harbour reconstruction project include the following components; 1. Reconstruction of improved breakwaters for harbour basin and entrance channel; 2. Reconstruction of improved main quay wall and a side quay wall; 3. Maintenance dredging of the harbour; 4. Extension of the harbour basin; 5. Reclamation of small area of land by dredge sediment disposal; 6. Construction of revetments on a 14m section for the newly reclaimed land; 7. Installation of navigational lights. The present harbour facility at the Guraidhoo Island is greatly damaged and is not serving its intended function of providing safe access to the island and safe mooring of vessels. Additionally, the size of the harbour is identified as inadequate for the present need and expected economic growth of the island. The harbour forms a key part in many livelihood activities of the island and is frequently used by passenger and cargo vessels as well as vessels travelling to and from Laamu atoll. Hence, the improvement of harbour facility will greatly benefit the island community while also enabling future economic development at the island. The proposed project is not expected to cause any long term major irreversible environmental impacts, though few temporary impacts during the construction phase is expected. These impacts can be successfully mitigated by following the measures recommended in this EIA. The construction phase of the project is also expected to present several negative socio-cultural and economic impacts, which can also be mitigated by following measures presented in this EIA. Since the successful operation of the ice plant facility present at the island, after the reconstruction of the harbour is seen as a major economic benefit to island as well as protection of the private property of the business must be ensured when implementing the proposed project, it is highly recommended that the necessary relocation of the ice plant’s pump station and the pipeline is resolved before implementing the proposed project by following the proposed mitigation measures in this report. Overall, the project is expected to yield major positive impacts in socio-cultural and economic sector when the new harbour comes into operation. Based on the results of the assessments, this EIA study concludes that with the proposed mitigation in place, the project is justifiable, would be environmentally acceptable and could proceed in compliance with the relevant environmental legislations and regulations. In this EIA, the consultants have proposed an Environmental management plan to ensure that the construction phase of the project does not cause major unexpected impacts on the environment as well as to ensure that the proposed measures are working effectively to safeguard the environment.Item Environmental impact assessment for the provision of RO plant and storage tank in L. Gan, K. Gaafaru & B. Kendhoo(2017-12) Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyItem Environmental impact assessment for the reconstruction of Guraidhoo Harbour, Thaa Atoll, Maldives(2015-12) Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyThe Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure requested the services of Maldives Energy and Environmental Company (MEECO) to provide an Environmental Impact Study (EIA) for the re-construction of harbour at Guraidhoo Island, Thaa Atoll. The assessment addresses specific key issues stated in the Terms of Reference (TOR) as agreed between EPA and the Proponent following the Scoping Meeting held on the matter. This EIA report was prepared for the fulfilment of the requirements of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2012 with the purpose of conducting an assessment of possible impacts on biophysical and human environment arising from proposed development project. The project is proposed by Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure, Maldives. The proposed harbour reconstruction project include the following components; 1. Reconstruction of improved breakwaters for harbour basin and entrance channel; 2. Reconstruction of improved main quay wall and a side quay wall; 3. Maintenance dredging of the harbour; 4. Extension of the harbour basin; 5. Reclamation of small area of land by dredge sediment disposal; 6. Construction of revetments on a 14m section for the newly reclaimed land; 7. Installation of navigational lights. The present harbour facility at the Guraidhoo Island is greatly damaged and is not serving its intended function of providing safe access to the island and safe mooring of vessels. Additionally, the size of the harbour is identified as inadequate for the present need and expected economic growth of the island. The harbour forms a key part in many livelihood activities of the island and is frequently used by passenger and cargo vessels as well as vessels travelling to and from Laamu atoll. Hence, the improvement of harbour facility will greatly benefit the island community while also enabling future economic development at the island. The proposed project is not expected to cause any long term major irreversible environmental impacts, though few temporary impacts during the construction phase is expected. These impacts can be successfully mitigated by following the measures recommended in this EIA. The construction phase of the project is also expected to present several negative socio-cultural and economic impacts, which can also be mitigated by following measures presented in this EIA. Overall, the project is expected to yield major positive impacts in socio-cultural and economic sector when the new harbour comes into operation. Based on the results of the assessments, this EIA study concludes that with the proposed mitigation in place, the project is justifiable, would be environmentally acceptable and could proceed in compliance with the relevant environmental legislations and regulations. In this EIA, the consultants have proposed an Environmental management plan to ensure that the construction phase of the project does not cause major unexpected impacts on the environment as well as to ensure that the proposed measures are working effectively to safeguard the environment.Item Environmental impact assessment for: Hdh. Neykurendhoo channel protection and maintenance dredging project(2015-12) Maldives Energy and Environmental Companya) This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report was prepared by Maldives Energy and Environmental Company (MEECO) upon request by the Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure (MHI), the project proponent to fulfil the legal requirements of the Environment Protection and Preservation Act (Law no: 4/93) for the project entitled “HDh. Neykurendhoo channel protection and maintenance dredging”. b) The assessment was prepared addressing the key issues highlighted in the Terms of Reference (TOR) agreed between the proponent and EPA. c) Neykurendhoo is an average sized island with a population of a little over 700, where basic services are available. The island has got an average sized harbour constructed in 2007 that is currently being used by boats owned locally as well as fishing and cargo vessels from other islands as a berthing location. d) MHI proposed this project to address the requirement for providing safe access to Neykurendhoo. No maintenance dredging had been carried out since the construction of the harbour in 2007. The channel is reported to have become shallower over the years as a result of siltation in the area. In addition the breakwater at the entrance of the harbour was constructed too short to provide adequate protection from wind and waves. e) The project is in line with government policies and legislation, and the proponent is committed to obtaining all the necessary permits and approvals prior to the commencement of the project. f) The project proposes to construct a 116.2 m rock boulder extension to the existing breakwater at the entrance channel, and apply excavation techniques to conduct maintenance dredging. The dredge material is proposed to be used for levelling the access road from the residential areas of the island to the harbour. The proponent commits to put in place all the measures necessary to minimise the impacts of the development on the environment. g) Assessment of the existing environment revealed that there were relatively few benthic communities to be directly affected as a result of the proposed activities. The channel has a sandy bottom characteristic of dredged locations. The only activity expected to cause damage to the benthic communities were the placement of the rock boulder extension to the breakwater. However, the coral communities in the area were in relatively sparse abundance and consisted only of small colonies. The impact on coral reefs is expected to revert back to its original state once the environment has stabilised upon completion of the project. h) The major impact to the surrounding areas would be from sedimentation during dredging, especially since for much of the year the location will experience winds and the resulting wind-generated surface currents away from the island. Adequate silt netting would minimise the impacts to the surrounding areas during construction phase. i) The proponent is fully committed to fulfilling the requirements of the monitoring plan developed, and undertake any mitigation measures necessary to minimise the negative impacts of this project j) The benefits of this project outweigh the slight negative impacts caused by the project, and is encouraged to implement the project giving due considerations to the environmental issues.Item Environmental impact assessment for land reclamation at Thinadhoo, G.Dh Atoll, Maldives(2015-12) Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyThis report provides the finding of an environmental impact assessment conducted for the reclamation of 56 hectares on the north and south of Thinadhoo to facilitate much needed additional land for the residents of the island. The project is proposed by Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure. According to EIA Regulations 2012, an Environmental Impact Assessment is required for reclamation and dredging projects. Thinadhoo is a highly urbanized settlement and the settlement footprint covers 90% of the total habitable land area. As a result almost all land available is currently being used for housing, economic establishments and socio- economic infrastructure on the island and the island is land-locked. Hence, there is an urgent and immediate need for land reclamation in Thinadhoo. It is estimated that approximately 1.5 million cubic metres of borrow materials would be needed to reclaim 56 hectares of land in Thinadhoo. The proposed locations for the sand borrow areas are within intra-atoll basin of Gdh. Atoll. Alternatives have been identified in the project document. These include alternatives for the dredge areas, dredge method and alternative reclaimed areas. In addition, a coastal protection of the 80% of the reclaimed land (approximately 1852 m) would be put in place. Environmental impacts were identified and assessed for both the reclamation (construction) phase and operational phase of the project. Most of the environmental impacts of the project have been identified as positive resulting mainly from improved socio-economic conditions, increased economic activities in Gdh. Atoll as a whole, direct and indirect employment opportunities, and increased business opportunities. The main negative environmental impact of the project is identified to be the changes in hydrodynamics and sedimentation. Moreover, a significant impact would be felt on the marine environment in the northern part where an inevitable habitat loss would occur. The impacts of the project would be felt on the marine ecosystem of Thinadhoo and mitigation measures have been proposed to reduce sedimentation and other adverse impacts that would arise from the project. Mitigation measures such as, proper timing of dredging and reclamation, management of traffic, proper use of bund walls or silt screens have been proposed. If not properly managed, there could be cumulative impacts due to sedimentation which is already experienced in the nearby reef systems. These include provision of bunds and control of dredge water flow in to the marine environment. These methods have been discussed in detail in the report. The main mitigation measure for the proposed project would be the provision of shore protection for the newly reclaimed areas. The Proponent, Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure is committed to undertake monitoring during all stages of the project. The activities proposed in the project comply with the environmental laws of the Maldives, its rules and regulations. In conclusion, this EIA has looked into the key factors that needed to be looked in to during construction and operational stage. In my opinion, even though this project does have significant environmental impacts to the marine environment, the significant positive impacts that would arise from the reclamation to an atoll that lacks many natural resources for other economic gain, the additional land would provide such as asset for the wellbeing of the population and residents of the island/atoll.Item Environmental impact assessment for rehabilitation and repair of harbour at Inguraidhoo Island, Raa Atoll(2015-08) Maldives Energy and Environmental Company1. The Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure requested the services of Maldives Energy and Environmental Company (MEECO) to provide an Environmental Impact Study (EIA) for the rehabilitation and repair of the harbour, Inguraidhoo Island, Raa Atoll, Maldives. 2. The assessment addresses specific key issues stated in the Terms of Reference (ToR) as agreed between EPA and the Proponent following the Scoping Meeting held on the matter. 3. Inguraidhoo harbour was developed in 1998 by dredging into the island from the original coastline of the Island to create the required space for the harbour basin. Since then there was a major repair done in the year 2005, however, the repair and maintenance activity for the harbour had been performed was not adequate. Moreover, the island envision of expanding the basin to cater to the growing demand of increasing vessels in the island. 4. Inguraidhoo has a registered population of 1,842 people. Due to the poor design and workmanship during the construction of its existing harbour, it has failed to provide much anticipated protection and safety for the travellers and vessels. Consequently, the people of the island have suffered enormously. The present entrance channel creates dangerous situations particularly during the rough weather conditions. There had been several incidents of damages to the vessels, people and to property while trying to pass through the channel. In addition to the problems caused due to the deterioration of the breakwater, the original height of the seawall is not adequate to prevent overtopping of waves into the harbour basin creating very rough conditions during bad weather. Similarly the low height of the quay wall allows overtopping of waves into the coast causing flooding. 5. In order to alleviate the above problems the Proponent intends to rehabilitate the breakwater, extending the breakwater to provide protection for the harbour entrance, constructing revetment on the northern and southern ends of the harbour adjoining the land, maintenance dredging of shallow areas within the harbour basin and the entrance channel. 6. The Consultants assessed the potential environmental impacts using sound scientific methodology, literature review and experiences from the past projects of similar nature. In addition views and opinions of the key stakeholders have been reflected in the report. The main findings have been summarised in the following sub-paragraphs. a. Due to the critical role the harbour plays in the socio-economic development of the island, the existing problems associated with the harbour need to be addressed as a matter of priority. b. Environmental impacts assessment carried out for the project indicates that the project can be successfully implemented without an irreversible significant damages to the environment and that the socio-economic benefits to the community and the region far outweighs minor damages that may arise out of the project. c. The project, however, has inevitable low magnitude negative impacts, including, sedimentation over parts of the reef, noise and vibration due to piling and construction activities, pollution from solid and hazardous waste. Hence, the project shall put in place the mitigation measures prescribed in the report while undertaking the project activities. 7. The Inguraidhoo harbour maintenance and rehabilitation project is of utmost importance to the people of the island. The project is in line with the government’s policies and can be implemented in fully compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. The Proponent has given full commitment to undertake mitigation measures given in the report during the project implementation. Hence the negative impacts can be effectively mitigated through the prescribed actions and the project could be implemented successfully.Item Environmental impact assessment for the construction of a harbour quaywall at Maduvvari, Meemu Atoll(2015-01) Maldives Energy and Environmental CompanyThis document is prepared to meet the necessary requirements to get clearance from the Environmental Protection Agency in order to carry out the proposed harbor quaywall reconstruction project at Meemu atoll Maduvvari. It has been prepared in compliance with the EIA regulation of 2007, under the Environmental Protection and Preservation Act (Act No. 4/93). The islands existing harbor had been badly damaged by the 2004 Tsunami, rendering it unsafe and unsuitable. A breakwater had not been initially developed, and the rough monsoon waves made the existing quaywall unguarded against the elements of nature. The proposed development will reconstruct a new quaywall and will greatly improve the socio economic conditions of the island by providing a safer harbor with easier access. This Executive Summary highlights the key findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this project, which is proposed by the Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure and executed by the Maldives Transport and Contracting Company (MTCC). The proposed development comprises of the following key elements: ‐ Removal of the existing quaywall and reconstruction of a new quay wall of the same length, using T‐block elements. ‐ Construction of a pavement alongside the length of the new quaywall. ‐ Carrying out maintenance dredging of the basin to a depth of 3m below sea level. ‐ Reclaiming land at the northern side of the island using the demolished quaywall ‐ Using the dredged material (approximated at 550 m3) to level the road on the northern side of the island. Justification and Socioeconomic Considerations This project, instead of the alternatives, is best suited and the most feasible design solution, offering benefits in terms of the proposed location, environment, project activities, and future land developments of the island. The proponent considers that the views of major stakeholders and the community are important in the planning and design of the project. Public consultation has been conducted throughout the planning stages. The Maduvvari community supports the development of the project and their views have been considered in the planning and design process. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures The potential impacts will be minor and localized, with the impacts identified as being caused by the following main project activities. ‐ Impacts due to maintenance dredging ‐ Impacts due to reclamation of land on the northern side of the island ‐ Impacts due to leveling of roads on the northern side of the island The impacts are however, found to be temporary and weighs less than the benefits of the socio‐economic impacts caused by the development. The major negative impacts are listed as follows: ‐ Noise pollution potential source of noise pollution will arise during the construction phase of the project, with the usage of heavy machinery and equipment ‐ Unavoidable sedimentation caused by dredging works, which will increase the turbidity of the surrounding waters and adversely impact the marine organisms. Sedimentation of silt on the reef flat will be caused by excavation. ‐ Changes in the hydrodynamics of the island which could potentially affect the issue of coastal erosion of the island. Nevertheless, there are greater socioeconomic benefits. These include facilitating easier access to the harbor for the vessels, and minimizing of floods during high tide. Mitigation measures have been proposed for all the potential adverse impacts arising from the project activities. They include, among others: ‐ Carrying out the excavation during high tides to allow maximum flushing of the sediments. ‐ Reclaiming during low tides to minimize erosion of the dredged material. ‐ Reducing problems arising during construction by making the necessary announcements and posting the related sign boards. ‐ Limiting the construction hours to day time and avoiding simultaneous operation of the equipment. And environmental monitoring and management plan will be implemented during the project activities, to assess the effectiveness of the mitigation measures and compliance with the criteria. Alternate locations and technology The proposed location where the dredged material would be used is the best location as it is the most needed location to be reclaimed for future plans of the island. Alternative technology are not recommended either due to expensive process or the available technology not suitable to the environmental conditions. Conclusion This EIA report has identified and evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the project, in accordance with the rules and regulations. Overall, the report concludes that the project would be environmentally acceptable and in compliance with the environmental legislation and standards. The implementation of the mitigation measures during construction and operation stages will minimize potential negative impacts. This will be examined by a suitable monitoring and management plan.