Academic Articles -- ޢިލްމީ ލިޔުންތަކުގެ ޖަމާ
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Environmental impact assessment : L. Dhabidhoo harbor development project(2012-12) Water SolutionsThis report discusses the findings of a social and environmental impact study undertaken by Water Solutions Pvt. Ltd. at the request of Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure for the proposed harbour rehabilitation project at L. Dhanbidhoo. L. Dhanbidhoo is located on the northern rim of Laamu Atoll and has a population of 800. The island economy depends mainly on agriculture. The existing harbour at the island was constructed in 90’s. The quay wall was constructed using corals. The quay wall had been badly damaged and the harbour has become too small to cater the large and deep draft vessels which call to the harbour. Hence the proposed project is to develop the existing harbour which can cater the growing demand for the vessels which will be using the islands for the next 15 years. The proposed harbour development project includes, construction of 197 m of quay on eastern, southern and northern side of the harbour using L blocks, deepening the harbour basin to – 3 at mean sea level, development of a harbour basin by 137 m long and 78 m wide, construction of 150 m rock boulder breakwater using dredged material as the core material. The project also includes deepening of the three access channels to a depth of – 3m at MSL. As part of the project, market lights would be place at the entrance channels. The excavation work of the project is expected to generate around 34,900 m3 of dredged materials of which 6,000 m3 is expected to be used as core materials of the breakwater, 12,000 m3 as back filling at the quay walls and 16,900 m3 to replenish the area of the beach on southern end of the harbour. 60 m long revetment would be constructed north and south of the harbour to protect the harbour from erosion. Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the project were assessed. The impacts of the project result mainly from excavation of the harbour basin and entrance channel and disposal of excavated materials. The impact of excavation would be that of sedimentation. This impact is considered to be minor and short-term. Re-excavation of the entrance channels and harbour basin would have irreversible impacts. The project would help to address the current erosion problem by replenishing the eroding beach with the materials borrowed from the harbour basin. The socio-economic benefits of the project may be considered to outweigh the negative impacts of the project on the physical environment of the island especially increasing the usable space on the quay wall, mooring area at the island’s harbour and additional land that would be available to develop fish processing industry. The proposed project conforms to prevalent environmental legislation and thrives to achieve its objectives in an environmentally friendly manner. Mitigation measures for these anticipated impacts have been identified and outlined in detail, including sedimentation and stagnation control methods and measures for minimizing negative effects demolition of the quay wall and the generation of construction waste. These mitigation measures need to be followed in order to minimize environmental damage. The details of the project have been established after considering the needs and requirements of the community by assessing and incorporating the outcomes from the community consultations held during the data collection stage. The EIA also allowed to explore alternatives for the proposed development and identified key mitigation strategies. Alternative locations and alternative designs have been investigated for the different components of the project. However, the present project design seems to be a feasible option in terms of costs, durability and safety. An environmental management plan with environmental monitoring plan has been developed including important elements that require regular checks. This monitoring component will be adhered to and will allow the assessment of changes due to construction of the harbour. Although the project involves inevitable negative environmental impacts, such impacts are not severe as to not undertake the project. The project is justifiable in light of the socioeconomic conditions and anticipated benefits resulting from the project, which seem to outweigh the negative environmental impacts.Item Environmental impact assessment for the proposed coastal protection and modification to the original concept at Moofushi Island Resort, South Ari Atoll, Maldives(2010-07-01) Water SolutionsThis report discusses the findings of an environmental impact assessment undertaken by Water Solutions Pvt. Ltd for undertaking the coastal protection works and bring minor modifications to the resort development concept. Moofushi Island is currently under redevelopment. The redevelopment is being undertaken after obtaining the proper approval including the approval of the EIA. Since construction began in September 2005, the need arose to bring minor modifications to the original development concept, which includes the following components. ‐ Construction of a new swimming pool ‐ Extension of the arrival jetty by 10 meters ‐ Construction of new breakwaters for better coastal protection ‐ Modification and repair of some of the existing breakwaters for better coastal protection ‐ Replenishment of the eroded areas of the beach ‐ Removal of some groynes and seawall that are not functioning Although Moofushi has coastal protection, they are not functioning entirely and some areas of the coastline are undergoing chronic erosion. Hence, new coastal protection measures have been suggested. The proposed project conforms to all prevalent environmental and tourism legislation and thrives to achieve its objectives in the most environmentally friendly manner. Environmental impacts were assessed for both the construction and operation phase of the project. Most of the environmental impacts of the project have been identified as resulting mainly from beach replenishment. The main impact would be that of sedimentation on the nearby reef areas. This impact is considered to be short‐term and cumulative. Nevertheless, mitigation measures have been proposed for anticipated negative impacts. Mitigation measures for these negative impacts have been identified and outlined in detail, especially sedimentation control methods. The most important mitigation measure is the use of bund walls in the replenishment areas. The proposed mitigation measures will have to be followed in order to minimize environmental damage. The measures proposed to minimize or mitigate environmental impacts may be considered to be quite appropriate, thereby minimizing the impact by about 90%. The main negative environmental impact of the proposed project would be sedimentation, which may cause death or partial death of corals. The commitment by the proponent to undertake mitigation measures is proven by the summary monitoring reports undertaken by the client since the inception of the resort redevelopment stage in September 2009 (attached as an annex). Since construction began, Moofushi island’s environment has been monitored continuously as per the monitoring schedule outlined in the EIA of 2009, which was approved for the redevelopment. The proponent also commits to undertake the monitoring programme set out in this EIA report knowing that monitoring will help to identify the effectiveness of the mitigation measures and take precautions to minimize any damage to the main tourist attraction of the island, which is its environment. Therefore, it appears justified from a technical, social, economic and environmental point of view, to carry out the proposed modifications.Item