Institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning : differences in student perceptions
Loading...
Date
2023-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
ޓާރކިޝް އޮންލައިން ޖާރނަލް އޮފް ޑިސްޓެންސް އެޑިއުކޭޝަން
ޓާރކިޝް އޮންލައިން ޖާރނަލް އޮފް ޑިސްޓެންސް އެޑިއުކޭޝަން
Abstract
Blended learning (BL) has been a popular mode of course delivery in higher education, aiming to provide
students with better learning experiences by integrating face-to-face (f2f) instructions and affordances of
digital technology. However, lack of knowledge about how students perceive BL cross-disciplines can make
it difficult for teachers to provide consistent learning experiences to students, yielding inequity in learning
experiences. This study aims to explore how university students perceive BL, and to compare differences in
perceptions across subjects. Participants were 407 university students from eight subject disciplines. Data
were collected through a questionnaire and were analyzed using SPSS. A one-way ANOVA was performed
to compare the differences between the groups. Results showed, students were generally happy about the use
of BL, despite facing multiple barriers in using the learning approach. Results further revealed that students
studying tourism/hospitality, and business subjects were more negative about BL, while students in science,
and Islamic studies faculties were more receptive to BL compared to the rest of the university.
Description
Keywords
Blended learning, institutional adoption, TAM, higher education.
Citation
Alı, R. (2023). INSTITUTIONAL ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING: DIFFERENCES IN STUDENT PERCEPTIONS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.973869
ރާމިޒް އަލީ. (2023). އިންސްޓިޓޫޝަނަލް އެޑޮޕްޝަން އެންޑް އިމްޕްލިމެންޓޭޝަން އޮފް ބްލެންޑަޑް ލާރނިންގް : ޑިފަރެންސަސް އިން ސްޓޫޑަންޓް ޕާރސެޕްޝަންސް. ޓާރކިޝް އޮންލައިން ޖާރނަލް އޮފް ޑިސްޓެންސް އެޑިއުކޭޝަން، 24(1)، 37-53. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.973869
ރާމިޒް އަލީ. (2023). އިންސްޓިޓޫޝަނަލް އެޑޮޕްޝަން އެންޑް އިމްޕްލިމެންޓޭޝަން އޮފް ބްލެންޑަޑް ލާރނިންގް : ޑިފަރެންސަސް އިން ސްޓޫޑަންޓް ޕާރސެޕްޝަންސް. ޓާރކިޝް އޮންލައިން ޖާރނަލް އޮފް ޑިސްޓެންސް އެޑިއުކޭޝަން، 24(1)، 37-53. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.973869
