Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Environmental impact assessment: coastal components of proposed refurbishment Chaaya Lagoon Hakuraa Huraa, Meemu Atoll, Maldives|
|Keywords: ||Beach enhancement|
Environmental impact assessments
|Issue Date: ||1-Jun-2010|
|Citation: ||Sandcays. (2010). Environmental impact assessment: coastal components of proposed refurbishment Chaaya Lagoon Hakuraa Huraa, Meemu Atoll, Maldives. Male': Maldives|
|Abstract: ||This report addresses the environmental concerns of the proposed coastal components of the refurbishment
planned for 2010 for Chaaya Lagoon Hakuraa Huraa, Meemu Atoll. The primary objective of the project is to
enhance the natural environmental of Hakuraa and to improve the services offered to guests thereby minimizing
operational and environmental costs. As such the project encompasses modifications to the existing jetty head to
incorporate a fixed seaplane platform that would bring an end to dhoni transfers from existing floating platform,
deepening of the existing reef entrance channel so that it can be used by supply and other dhonis saving time and fuel and providing beach on the southside shoreline where there is no beach.
Hence, different options for the proposed project, especially the beach enhancement component have been
evaluated and the most practicable options not entailing excessive costs have been recommended. Since the
resort is already closed for renovation, it may not be possible to get all the proposed activities done in time for
reopening. Therefore, the beach enhancement and entrance channel deepening may have to be put off.
Hakuraa is surrounded by a large expanse of lagoon. Therefore, only the proposed channel deepening activity is
expected to impact the coral reef. The impact on the reef is not considerably large as the reef flat in the area has very low cover of live corals and the live corals on the reef slope is expected to be cleared of sediment within a short period by the current in the area. However, it would be useful to monitor such changes. It has also been
recommended to transplant any coral that may be directly impacted and may not recover from the effects of
sedimentation. In fact, all proposed activities would have short term sedimentation impacts, with the water quality
returning to normal within weeks.
The overall environmental impacts of the project have been assessed using appropriate matrices and the results
indicated that the proposed project had net positive impact. That is, the project has no major adverse impacts on
the environment as far as current knowledge is concerned. Given that the project has major socio-economic
benefits and some environmental benefits, it is recommended to allow the project to proceed as proposed.
However, alternative analysis for the coastal protection or beach enhancement component indicates that there is a
strong argument for added coastal protection. It has, therefore, been recommended to consider headland
revetments using geotextile containers in order to retain the sand that has been planned to be added to the
southside shore. Other feasible alternatives also have been considered.
Environmental monitoring recommended for the project includes the monitoring of the shorelines of Hakuraa and
neighbouring island and water quality and drogue studies of the coastal area for three years from the onset of the proposed project implementation. Annual monitoring reports have to be submitted over the monitoring period.|
|Appears in Collections:||ތިމާވެށި |
Items in Saruna are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.