Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/3646
Title: | Initial environmental evaluation for beach replenishment at Kadhdhoo Airport VIP Area, Laamu Atoll |
Authors: | Sandcays |
Keywords: | Beach replenishment Beach nourishment Legislative and regulatory considerations Meteorological conditions Existing coastal environment Environmental impacts Mitigation measures Environmental monitoring Initial environmental examination |
Issue Date: | Aug-2011 |
Citation: | Sandcays. (2011). Initial environmental evaluation for beach replenishment at Kadhdhoo Airport VIP Area, Laamu Atoll. Male': Maldives |
Abstract: | This report addresses the environmental concerns of the proposed beach nourishment at the VIP Area at the
southern end of Kadhdhoo Domestic Airport in L. Kadhdhoo. The area is devoid of beach due to the flow of
current in the channel. In addition, there are deepened areas just next to the beach which act as a sink for
sediments moving longshore. Therefore, it is proposed to place sand in these deepened areas to reduce depth so
that erosion is minimized and the safety of swimmers is enhanced. The borrow sites for the proposed beach
nourishment will be in the eastern side reef flat. However, the appropriateness of this location as a borrow site
has not been studied so far. It is expected that an area of about 20,000m2 would have to be excavated to a depth
of about 3m below MSL. This would be adequate to fill the dredged locations in the VIP area and to nourish the
approximately 470m long stretch of beach to about 10m from the current high tide line. It would be necessary to
sieve the sand before it is placed on the beach to match natural beach conditions preferred by clients.
Without structural protection, it may not be possible to keep the beach intact after nourishment. Therefore, regular
beach nourishment would be required in the absence of structural protection. Hence, it is proposed to undertake
regular beach nourishment by borrowing sand from the southeastern lagoon from the same location as the
proposed borrow area or by moving further south and southwest of the proposed borrow area. Since the borrow
area is on the rim reefward side of the lagoon, currents are never expected to take the sediment towards the reef
on this side. The reef on the western side is at quite a considerable distance that sedimentation of the reef would
be unlikely. Therefore, there are no major impacts due to the proposed beach nourishment activity as
anthropogenic impacts currently present in the area have greater impact. Deepening the rim reefward end of the
channel may affect flow in a positive way as it is expected to dampen the currents flowing in the channel by
absorbing part of the energy. Sand pumping from nearshore locations has the potential to aggravate erosion as
the borrow pits can become sediment sinks over a considerable period of time. If borrow areas are too close to
the shore, the impact on the island shoreline and the erosion of the nourished beaches would be quite rapid.
Therefore, it is recommended to keep the borrow areas as far as possible from the beach. In the case of the
proposed area, the movement of beach material into the dredged area would be minimal given that there would
be a net westerly current most of the time. Yet, it is suggested to keep the borrow area at least 40m from the
beach line.
The other possible impact would be the hindrance to growth of patch corals within the lagoon. However, there are
no significant coral patches within the lagoon which may be affected by the proposed beach nourishment activity.
Given that biological resources are not directly affected, aesthetic concerns are of importance in the proposed
project. Therefore, in order to maintain the aesthetic value of the beach and enhance the socio-economic benefits
of the proposed project, it is important beach nourishment is undertaken in such a way that beach nourishment
frequency does not exceed twice a year.
The most important mitigation measure in the case of the proposed project aimed at providing closely simulated
natural beach condition would be to sieve the borrow material to remove coral rubble to match natural beach
conditions to the greatest possible extent. The remaining coarse material after sieving shall be placed away from
the local beach areas on the western side so that they rarely get washed on to the shore.
Regular monitoring of the coastal area is essential to ensure that the sediment movement patterns are clearly
understood so that future mitigation measures will be more useful and meaningful. It would also help to alter
beach nourishment profiles so as to minimize the frequency of beach nourishment. Long term monitoring would
also help to design sustainable structural protection for long term protection. Therefore, monitoring the beaches
before, during and after the initial beach nourishment is recommended. It is recommended to monitor beach
profiles and currents in the channel as regularly as possible preferably every two months for the first two years. It
is also recommended to undertake regular beach nourishment at no more than twice a year.
Given that the project has minimal impact on the environment or ecological resources but high socio-economic
benefits, it is recommended to allow the project to proceed. However, the Proponent shall be required to follow
the proposed mitigation measures of placing only sieved sand on the beaches and regular monitoring of
shorelines, beach profiles and currents in the channel. |
URI: | http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/3646 |
Appears in Collections: | ތިމާވެށި Environment A
|
Items in Saruna are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.