Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/4688
Title: | Environmental impact assessment for the construction of a harbour quaywall at Maduvvari, Meemu Atoll |
Authors: | Maldives Energy and Environmental Company |
Keywords: | Applicable policies, laws and regulation Project description Survey methods Existing environment Socio economic environment environmental impacts and mitigation measures Socioeconomic and stakeholder consultations Environmental management and monitoring |
Issue Date: | Jan-2015 |
Citation: | Maldives Energy and Environmental Company. (2015). Environmental impact assessment for the construction of a harbour quaywall at Maduvvari, Meemu Atoll. Male': Maldives |
Abstract: | This document is prepared to meet the necessary requirements to get clearance from the
Environmental Protection Agency in order to carry out the proposed harbor quaywall
reconstruction project at Meemu atoll Maduvvari. It has been prepared in compliance with
the EIA regulation of 2007, under the Environmental Protection and Preservation Act (Act
No. 4/93).
The islands existing harbor had been badly damaged by the 2004 Tsunami, rendering it
unsafe and unsuitable. A breakwater had not been initially developed, and the rough
monsoon waves made the existing quaywall unguarded against the elements of nature. The
proposed development will reconstruct a new quaywall and will greatly improve the socio
economic conditions of the island by providing a safer harbor with easier access.
This Executive Summary highlights the key findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) for this project, which is proposed by the Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure and
executed by the Maldives Transport and Contracting Company (MTCC). The proposed
development comprises of the following key elements:
‐ Removal of the existing quaywall and reconstruction of a new quay wall of the same
length, using T‐block elements.
‐ Construction of a pavement alongside the length of the new quaywall.
‐ Carrying out maintenance dredging of the basin to a depth of 3m below sea level.
‐ Reclaiming land at the northern side of the island using the demolished quaywall
‐ Using the dredged material (approximated at 550 m3) to level the road on the
northern side of the island.
Justification and Socioeconomic Considerations
This project, instead of the alternatives, is best suited and the most feasible design solution,
offering benefits in terms of the proposed location, environment, project activities, and
future land developments of the island.
The proponent considers that the views of major stakeholders and the community are
important in the planning and design of the project. Public consultation has been conducted
throughout the planning stages. The Maduvvari community supports the development of
the project and their views have been considered in the planning and design process. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
The potential impacts will be minor and localized, with the impacts identified as being
caused by the following main project activities.
‐ Impacts due to maintenance dredging
‐ Impacts due to reclamation of land on the northern side of the island
‐ Impacts due to leveling of roads on the northern side of the island
The impacts are however, found to be temporary and weighs less than the benefits of the
socio‐economic impacts caused by the development. The major negative impacts are listed
as follows:
‐ Noise pollution potential source of noise pollution will arise during the construction
phase of the project, with the usage of heavy machinery and equipment
‐ Unavoidable sedimentation caused by dredging works, which will increase the
turbidity of the surrounding waters and adversely impact the marine organisms.
Sedimentation of silt on the reef flat will be caused by excavation.
‐ Changes in the hydrodynamics of the island which could potentially affect the issue
of coastal erosion of the island.
Nevertheless, there are greater socioeconomic benefits. These include facilitating easier
access to the harbor for the vessels, and minimizing of floods during high tide.
Mitigation measures have been proposed for all the potential adverse impacts arising from
the project activities. They include, among others:
‐ Carrying out the excavation during high tides to allow maximum flushing of the
sediments.
‐ Reclaiming during low tides to minimize erosion of the dredged material.
‐ Reducing problems arising during construction by making the necessary
announcements and posting the related sign boards.
‐ Limiting the construction hours to day time and avoiding simultaneous operation of
the equipment.
And environmental monitoring and management plan will be implemented during the
project activities, to assess the effectiveness of the mitigation measures and compliance
with the criteria. Alternate locations and technology
The proposed location where the dredged material would be used is the best location as it is
the most needed location to be reclaimed for future plans of the island. Alternative
technology are not recommended either due to expensive process or the available
technology not suitable to the environmental conditions.
Conclusion
This EIA report has identified and evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the
project, in accordance with the rules and regulations. Overall, the report concludes that the
project would be environmentally acceptable and in compliance with the environmental
legislation and standards. The implementation of the mitigation measures during
construction and operation stages will minimize potential negative impacts. This will be
examined by a suitable monitoring and management plan. |
URI: | http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/4688 |
Appears in Collections: | ތިމާވެށި Environment A
|
Items in Saruna are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.