Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/4868
Title: | Environmental impact assessment for the proposed sea water cooling system in Addu City, Maldives |
Authors: | Sandcays |
Keywords: | Seawater cooling system Engine cooling Legislative and regulatory considerations Existing environment Environmental impacts Mitigation measures Environmental monitoring Environmental impact assessments |
Issue Date: | May-2016 |
Citation: | Sandcays. (2016). Environmental impact assessment for the proposed sea water cooling system in Addu City, Maldives. Male': Maldives |
Abstract: | This report discusses the findings of an environmental impact study under the proposed sea
water cooling system for the electrical generator sets in the central power station of Addu city.
Central Power House at Addu City requires Engine cooling by using saline water. The system
will require installing three boreholes with multi stage submersible pumps, supply line for
pressure header and feeding lines with valves and flanges. The proponent of this project is
Fenaka Corporation Ltd. Rotary-mud drilling will be employed for the construction. The
depth of borehole will be determined in accordance with the existing guidelines; i.e. if
electrical conductivity of discharge water has reached 50-60mS/cm before reaching 30m
depth, drilling will continue until it has reached 30m. Furthermore, if electrical conductivity
of discharge water at 30m depth is measured less than 50-60mS/cm, drilling will be continued
until electrical conductivity reaches to 50-60mS/cm. The extracted earth and saline water
from drilling activities will be deposited on a purpose-built plastic sheet and water will be
separated from the solids. The water extracted from this is proposed to be disposed off into
the lagoon via the reject line in the operational phase.
The most significant impact from the proposed project would be temporary deterioration of
local freshwater quality during borehole installation and seawater quality at the disposal site.
The impact on groundwater during borehole construction is of low magnitude and temporary.
The impact is also of little significance. The impact of seawater quality at discharge location
is almost negligible given that the discharge water has similar characteristics to the lagoon
water in terms of salinity although the water would be hot at the time of discharge. Since the
discharge location is a reef flat area with no coral the impact is negligible. Furthermore, the
area gets dry at low tide and there is no recreational value in this area as it is the rim reef flat.
Alternatives have been identified in the EIA, however it is seen that the best method to carry
out the project is the proposed method of using boreholes. The alternative is to use a seawater
intake, however, due to the distance of a feasible intake location with the rim reef closest to
the location, boreholes are considered to be more suitable. The consultations with the Council
also revealed that the proposed route for the discharge pipeline is not suitable, as there is no
road in the proposed route. Therefore, as per the Council’s recommendation, it is proposed to
consider the alternative route that would dispose at the same location as the existing brine
discharge pipe.
Since there were no significant environmental impacts identified for the proposed project,
mitigation measure were general construction phase guidelines such as dust control measures
and appropriate waste management. The alternative route for the discharge pipe may also
mitigate some social concerns and is recommended to consider the alternative route. There
would not be additional costs associated with this alternative route, and even if there is, there
would not be a considerable cost difference.
Environmental monitoring is not considered necessary for this project. However, monitoring
has been proposed for about one year to assess and examine changes to the environment, if
any. It covers the monitoring of marine water quality at the discharge location for temperature
and salinity only at 3-monthly intervals for a maximum of 2 years. This can be integrated
within a monitoring programme for the powerhouse. Water quality testing that may be
necessary to be performed upon completion of the borehole, which has been indicated in the
Borehole Guidelines shall also be performed.
In conclusion, it appears justified from a technical and environmental point of view to carry
out the proposed project to construct a cooling water system for the existing powerhouse in
Hithadhoo, Addu City. However, it is recommended to consider the alternative route for
discharge pipeline, as recommended by Addu City Council. |
URI: | http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/4868 |
Appears in Collections: | ތިމާވެށި Environment A
|
Items in Saruna are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.